The Minimum About Olavo de Carvalho, by Ronald Robson

The Minimum About Olavo de Carvalho, by Ronald Robson, serves as a comprehensive introduction to one of Brazil’s most influential yet polarizing philosophers. It offers readers an insightful exploration of Olavo de Carvalho’s intellectual trajectory, from his early engagement with esotericism and astrology to his later critiques of modernity, science, and political thought. By focusing on Olavo’s major themes, such as his critique of modern philosophy, the role of intuition in knowledge, and the theory of the four discourses, Robson skillfully outlines the central ideas that shaped Olavo’s philosophical legacy.

In this work, Robson also highlights how Olavo’s philosophy is deeply rooted in the pursuit of reality through direct experience, beyond the conceptual frameworks that dominate contemporary thought. Olavo’s emphasis on “presence” as a foundational category for knowledge challenges modern epistemology and calls for a return to a more immediate, intuitive understanding of existence. The book takes readers on a journey through Olavo’s complex ideas, offering clarity on his unique blend of metaphysics, epistemology, and cultural critique.

More than just a biographical account, The Minimum About Olavo de Carvalho situates Olavo’s work within the broader context of Western thought while addressing the controversies that surrounded his life and career. Robson’s writing provides both novices and seasoned readers with a clear, structured entry point into Olavo’s profound—and often misunderstood—philosophical contributions. Through careful analysis, the book reveals the ways in which Olavo sought to reframe the intellectual landscape of Brazil and, ultimately, the Western world.

Study, by Olavo de Carvalho

This series of newspaper columns by Olavo de Carvalho was collected in this order in the book “The Minimum You Need To Know So As Not To Be An Idiot”.

In “The Tragedy of the Serious Student in Brazil”, Olavo criticizes the Brazilian educational system, especially its universities, for fostering intellectual mediocrity and focusing on left-wing political activism rather than genuine intellectual development. He contrasts the rich intellectual climate of the early 20th century with the shallow, politically motivated discourse that dominates modern Brazilian academia.

In “If You Still Want to Be a Serious Student…”, Olavo offers practical advice for students seeking serious intellectual formation outside of the mainstream educational system. He encourages independent study of classical thinkers, warns against the intellectual decay within universities, and emphasizes the need for a deep, disciplined approach to learning, combining philosophical rigor with historical and spiritual insight.

In “For the Intellectual Restoration of Brazil”, Olavo argues that Brazil needs a generation of students capable of genuine intellectual engagement. He stresses the importance of building an intellectual life rooted in historical and philosophical traditions, free from the ideological constraints of contemporary academia. He calls for the creation of alternative institutions to foster this intellectual growth, especially through the support of the private sector.

Finally, in “Spirit and Personality”, Olavo explores the relationship between thought and spirit, highlighting the transcendent nature of truth. He distinguishes between mere intellectual activity and genuine intelligence, which involves perceiving truths that transcend thought. He advocates for education that fosters intellectual and spiritual maturity, but laments that this goal is unattainable in today’s universities, urging students with initiative to seek intellectual growth independently.

Liberation, by Olavo de Carvalho

This series of newspaper columns by Olavo de Carvalho was collected in this order in the book “The Minimum You Need To Know So As Not To Be An Idiot”.

In “Self-Explanation”, Olavo reflects on his personal journey away from socialism, describing the liberating process of dismantling youthful ideological lies in adulthood. He emphasizes the existential satisfaction of rejecting false ideals, likening this process to Pinocchio becoming a real boy, and criticizes those who never fully abandon socialism, mistaking it for a lost ideal rather than a deceptive ideology.

In “Recycled Idiots”, Olavo discusses how many former leftist militants, after abandoning communism, transition into “useful idiots” for the left. He explains that these individuals fail to fully sever their ties with leftist ideology, instead seeking refuge in the “democratic left,” where they become susceptible to manipulation by their former comrades. Olavo critiques this superficial break with communism, arguing that many remain trapped in self-deception.

In “Doing My Duty”, Olavo critiques the communist mentality that reduces all political critique to partisan motives. He argues for the importance of independent thought, free from ideological labels, and emphasizes the need to criticize wrongdoing without aligning with a specific political side. Olavo also claims that in Brazil, there is no true right-wing movement, only leftist dominance in both the government and opposition.

In “Why I Am Not a Liberal”, Olavo distinguishes between conservatism and liberalism, critiquing the liberal tendency to prioritize market freedom over moral principles. He argues that while both ideologies value freedom, conservatives ground it in traditional moral values, whereas liberals see it as a contractual right, even allowing for morally questionable actions like euthanasia. Olavo positions conservatism as a defense of Judeo-Christian values, while liberalism, in his view, dissolves these values through market logic.

USA, by Olavo de Carvalho

This series of newspaper columns by Olavo de Carvalho was collected in this order in the book “The Minimum You Need To Know So As Not To Be An Idiot”. It is divided into two parts: the first on Bush, and the second on Obama.

The first part of the collection, focused on George W. Bush, consists of three articles that explore the media’s role in shaping public opinion and the moral implications of the Iraq War. In “The Disadvantage of Seeing”, Olavo argues that the Brazilian media’s anti-American narrative remains intact, despite the transformative impact of the 9/11 attacks on American public opinion. He criticizes the media for selectively omitting facts about the opposition to globalism within the U.S. conservative movement, which he believes could challenge the outdated anti-Americanism prevalent in Brazil. In “In the Name of the Corpses”, Olavo reflects on the moral necessity of Bush’s decision to invade Iraq, particularly after the discovery of mass graves containing 300,000 victims of Saddam Hussein’s regime. He contends that even without weapons of mass destruction, Bush’s actions were morally justified to stop the genocidal dictatorship. The third article, “Evaluating George W. Bush”, praises Bush for keeping the U.S. safe from terrorist attacks and for his handling of the Iraq War. However, Olavo criticizes Bush for failing to confront his internal political enemies and allowing the Republican Party to lose ground domestically, preventing a long-term conservative shift in U.S. politics.

The second part, devoted to Barack Obama, spans eleven articles in which Olavo harshly critiques Obama’s administration, accusing him of orchestrating political crises and enabling the growth of globalist and socialist agendas. In “The Parents of the American Crisis”, Olavo traces the 2008 financial crisis to leftist activists like Saul Alinsky and the Cloward-Piven strategy, which aimed to overload the welfare system and cause economic collapse. “The Advent of the Secret Dictatorship” accuses Obama of signing secret decrees, gradually transforming the U.S. into a dictatorship. In “Fleeing Humiliation”, Olavo discusses how Obama’s background and forged documents were hidden by the media, while “The Birthers’ Mistake” (part of “Depressing Notes”) argues that birthers should have focused on document fraud instead of Obama’s eligibility. In “Obama’s Zero Hunger”, Olavo compares Obama’s economic policies to Lula’s, suggesting that Obama intentionally created poverty to expand government control. The next article, “The Empire of Pure Coincidences”, alleges that Obama’s scandals and election irregularities are part of a broader conspiracy. “Saving the Global Triumvirate” critiques Obama’s efforts to weaken American power in favor of a globalist agenda. In “Old Trick”, Olavo describes how leftists use the media to manipulate public opinion. “Thinking Like Revolutionaries” and “Disarming the Little Ones” examine how Obama’s policies, especially on gun control, are part of a revolutionary strategy to disarm and control the population. Finally, in “Armed and Disarmed”, Olavo concludes by condemning Obama’s attempts to disarm his political opponents while arming government agencies, comparing it to Hitler’s tactics in the 1930s.

Domination, by Olavo de Carvalho

This series of newspaper columns by Olavo de Carvalho was collected in this order in the book “The Minimum You Need To Know So As Not To Be An Idiot”.

The first article, “The Owners of the World”, outlines three competing global power projects: the Russian-Chinese (Eurasian), Western (often mislabeled Anglo-American), and Islamic. He argues that each bloc is shaped by distinct geopolitical, economic, or religious ambitions, and while competition between them exists, there are areas of collaboration. Olavo highlights that most analyses fail to recognize the intertwined nature of these forces, leading to skewed perspectives.

In “What is Happening”, Olavo criticizes the popular narrative that the Cold War was solely a conflict between socialism and capitalism. He reveals that powerful Western elites, including the Morgans and Rockefellers, have historically supported various socialist movements, including Marxism, Fabianism, and even National Socialism, to further their global agenda. He suggests that while Western elites played both sides, the real conflict between East and West is only now beginning, with Russia under Putin emerging as a true adversary.

Finally, in “Who Rules the World?”, Olavo explores the complex question of global leadership, noting that behind governments lie powerful elites who truly control world affairs. He references the work of sociologist Charles Wright Mills to explain the intricate web of power in the United States, dominated by the Fabian globalist elite. In contrast, the power structures of Russia, China, and the Islamic world remain opaque, complicating accurate global power analyses.

Against the Execrable Bull of the Antichrist, by Martin Luther

Martin Luther’s Against the Execrable Bull of the Antichrist (1520) is his vehement response to Pope Leo X’s excommunication bull, Exsurge Domine. Luther accuses the bull of being the work of the Antichrist, specifically targeting the Roman Curia and the papal theologian John Eck. He believes the bull condemns his teachings without providing scriptural justification or reason, instead relying on papal authority alone.

Luther expresses disbelief that the Pope and the Church could be so irrational as to issue such a document. He mocks the bull’s reliance on vague and unsubstantiated condemnations, labeling it ignorant and cowardly. He challenges the Church’s failure to prove his heresies with sound doctrine or scripture. Throughout, Luther affirms his commitment to the truth of Christ, asserting that his articles are based on scripture and true Christian doctrine.

He passionately rejects the bull’s accusations, curses it, and declares that the true Antichrist is reigning through the Roman Church. Luther sees his own excommunication as an honor and a sign that he is defending God’s truth. He concludes by offering himself up for martyrdom rather than retracting any of his teachings and warns Christians to reject the false teachings of the Papacy, declaring that the true Antichrist is present in Rome.

95 Theses on Indulgences, by Martin Luther

This edition of the Ninety-Five Theses, by Martin Luther, is hyperlinked to the proofs of each proposition in his Resolutions on Indulgences (also known as the Explanations of the Ninety-Five Theses), as well as to the first apparently relevant section I could find within this blog’s translation of Luther’s Asterisks to Johann Eck’s Obelisks, which had also discussed the theses, though without referring to them clearly by number. The condemnation of some propositions in the papal bull Exsurge Domine is also added, where available, although the condemnations in the Council of Trent should also be consulted, which have not been linked here.

---

Out of love and zeal for clarifying the truth, these matters will be discussed in Wittenberg under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and Sacred Theology, and lecturer therein. Therefore, he requests that those who cannot debate with us verbally and in person do so by letter in their absence. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

Exsurge Domine, by Pope Leo X

Exsurge Domine, a papal bull issued by Pope Leo X on June 15, 1520, marks a pivotal moment in the Catholic Church’s response to the growing influence of Martin Luther and his teachings. The bull formally condemned 41 of Luther’s propositions, which were deemed heretical, scandalous, or offensive to pious ears. Rooted in the Church’s authority, the document called for Luther and his followers to recant their errors within 60 days or face excommunication. This declaration aimed to curb the spread of Protestantism and protect the unity and doctrine of the Catholic faith. Despite the bull’s demands, Luther famously rejected its contents, burning the document publicly, an act that further solidified the schism between the Catholic Church and the emerging Protestant movement.

Resolutions on Indulgences, by Martin Luther

This book has Martin Luther’s explanations of his 95 theses.