For seeking the truth and consoling timid consciences, these theses will be discussed in turns according to our custom, under the direction of Reverend Father Martin Luther, Augustinian. 1518.
- Among those ecclesiastical remissions, the remission of guilt far surpasses the remission of penalty.
- The remission of guilt soothes the heart and removes the greatest of all penalties, namely, the conscience of sin.
- The remission of penalty sometimes increases a bad conscience, sometimes nourishes worse presumption.
- The remission of guilt reconciles a person to God; the remission of penalty reconciles a person to others, that is, to the church.
- When guilt and conscience are remitted, there is no penalty in the penalty, but joy in tribulations.
- A person can be saved without the remission of penalty, but by no means without the remission of guilt.
- It is more beneficial for salvation if, absolved from guilt, one omits the redemption of penalties.
- The remission of guilt does not rely on the contrition of the sinner, nor on the office or power of the priest.
- It relies rather on faith, which is in the word of Christ saying: “Whatever you loose,” etc. [Matthew 16:19]
- For it is true that not the sacrament of faith, but the faith of the sacrament (that is, not because it is performed, but because it is believed) justifies.
- Christ did not wish human salvation to depend on human hands or judgment.
- But as it is written: “He upholds all things by the word of His power,” [Hebrews 1:3] and: “purifying their hearts by faith.” [Acts 15:9]
- Those who assert the uncertainty of the remission of guilt due to the uncertainty of contrition err to the point of unbelief.
- No matter how uncertain both priest and sinner are about contrition, absolution is valid if one believes oneself absolved.
- Therefore, it is certain that sins are forgiven if you believe they are forgiven, because the promise of Christ the Savior is certain.
- One absolved by the key ought rather to die and deny every creature than to doubt their absolution.
- To doubt that one’s absolution is pleasing to God is to simultaneously doubt that Christ was truthful when He said: “Whatever,” etc. [Matthew 16:19]
- Building the remission on contrition is building on sand, that is, on human works, rather than on the faith of God.
- It is an injury to the sacrament and a machinery of despair not to believe in absolution until contrition is certain.
- Indeed, to want to build the confidence of the conscience on contrition is to declare God a liar and oneself truthful.
- Such people presume most ruinously on their works and strengths, not on the mercy and word of Christ.
- Indeed, they perversely want to establish the word and faith themselves, rather than being established by the word and faith.
- Priests are not the authors of remission, but ministers of the word in the faith of remission.
- The power of the keys works a firm and infallible deed by the word and command of God, unless you are deceitful.
- The priest has sufficient evidence of contrition if he perceives the sinner asking for and believing in absolution.
- Indeed, it is much more necessary to ask him whether he believes himself absolved than whether he is sufficiently sorrowful.
- The priest must also beware not to explore contrition alone so that a person believes themselves absolved because of it.
- Rather, the words of Christ “Take heart, son, your sins are forgiven” [Matthew 9:2] must be impressed upon him, more than examining his worthiness.
- Consequently, the words of Christ “whose sins you forgive,” etc., [John 20:23] are understood not of penalties but of guilt.
- Just as a priest teaches, baptizes, and truly communicates, yet these are the workings of the Spirit within,
- So he truly forgives and absolves from guilt, yet this is the work of the Spirit within.
- In all these things, while he ministers the word of Christ, he simultaneously exercises the faith by which the sinner is inwardly justified.
- For nothing justifies except faith alone in Christ, to which the ministry of the word by the priest is necessary.
- Without this faith, the contrition of sinners is a work of despair and more offensive to God than reconciling.
- A priest can abuse the key and sin by absolving someone he should not have, being restricted,
- But the absolution is not null unless the faith of the absolved is also null.
- Just as in baptism and the Eucharist, even a restricted and prohibited key truly baptizes and communicates,
- So in penance, however prohibited, it truly absolves, provided there is no deceit in the absolved.
- Even a lighthearted and joking priest or one acting knowingly against the restriction still truly baptizes and absolves.
- Imagine a case (per impossibility) of someone being absolved without contrition but believing themselves absolved; this person is truly absolved.
- No reservation of cases or restriction can stand against this if it was and remains unknown.
- The sacraments of the new law are not such effective signs of grace that it is enough not to put up an obstacle in receiving them.
- Rather, whoever approaches any sacrament without faith, approaches it falsely and to their own judgment.
- The sacraments of the old and new law differ in that the former were of the flesh, while the latter are justifications of the spirit.
- In the new ones, there is the word of the promiser; in the old ones, this was lacking, and hence the faith of the receiver of remission.
- Just as venial sins do not pertain to the confession and absolution of the keys, neither do all mortal sins.
- If a person were required to confess all mortal sins and be absolved from them, they would be required to do the simply impossible.
- No human knows how many times they sin mortally, even in good works because of vain glory.
- One should only confess those sins that are certain to themselves or others as being mortal, that is, crimes,
- For the rest, despairing of oneself, one should trustfully throw oneself into the abyss of the mercy of God who faithfully promises.
To sum it up:
The righteous will live by faith, not by works or by the law. Romans 1. [Romans 1:17]
No comments:
Post a Comment